Hyzone: Diversifying Resources in Learning Spaces via Personalized Interfaces

R. Morales-Salcedo, H. Ogata, and Y. Yano


  1. [1] Knowledge Query and Manipulation Language (KQML) specification, http://www.cs.umbc.edu/kqml.
  2. [2] Java Servlet technology specification, http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/.
  3. [3] Java Remote Method Invocation (RMI),http://java.sun.com/products/jdk/rmi/.
  4. [4] H.Ogata, H. Yoshiaki, & Y. Yoneo, CoCoA2: Computersupported collaborative language learning environment basedon online proofreading, Proc. ED-Media, Montreal, 2000, 801–806.
  5. [5] H. Ogata, K. Matsuura, & Y. Yano, Computational modelin agent-based asynchronous virtual classroom, Workshop onComputational Models of Collaborative Learning Interaction,CSCL 2002, Boulder CO, 2002, 72–73.
  6. [6] H. Yoshiaki, H. Ogata, & Y. Yoneo, Video-based language learning environment through asynchronous collaboration, Proc. CSCL2003, Bergen, Norway, 2003, 170–172.
  7. [7] H. Ogata, K. Matsuura, & Y. Yoneo, Sharlok: Bridginglearning through active knowledge awareness, IEEE Int. Conf.on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC), Beijing, 1996, 601–606. doi:10.1109/ICSMC.1996.569860
  8. [8] R. Morales-Salcedo & Y. Yoneo, Effective collaboration in avideoconference-based CSCL environment, World Conf. on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Denver, CO, 2002, 1344–1370.
  9. [9] I. Nonaka & H. Takeuchi, The knowledge creating company(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995).
  10. [10] G. Ayala, Towards lifelong learning environments: Agentssupporting the collaborative construction of knowledge invirtual communities, Proc. Int. Conf. on Computer Supportfor Collaborative Learning, Bergen, Norway, 2003, 141–149.
  11. [11] S. Greenberg & M. Roseman, Using a room metaphor to easetransitions in groupware, Research report 98/611/02, Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada, 1998.
  12. [12] D. A. Henderson & S.K. Card, Rooms: The use of multiplevirtual workspaces to reduce space contention in a window-based graphical interface, ACM Trans. on Graphics, 5 (3),1986, 211–243. doi:10.1145/24054.24056
  13. [13] B. Shneiderman & C. Plaisant, The future of graphic userinterfaces: Personal role managers, UMD CS-TR-3285, CAR-TR-713, ISR-TR-94-48, People and Computers IX, British Computer Society’s HCU, Glasgow, 1994, 3–8.
  14. [14] S. Cousins, A. Paepcke, T. Winograd, E.A. Bier, & K. Pier,The digital library integrated task environment (DLITE), Proc.2 nd ACM Int. Conf. on Digital Libraries, Philadelphia, PA,1997, 142–151. doi:10.1145/263690.263807
  15. [15] J.A. Sanchez, C. Proal, C. Carballo, & A. Perez, Personaland group spaces: Integrating resources for users of digitallibraries, Proc. 4 th Workshop on Human Factors in ComputerSystems, Florianopolis, Brazil, 2001, 15–17.
  16. [16] A. Lakos & C. Gray, Personalized library portals as an organizational culture change agent: Reflections on possibilities andchanges, Information Technology and Libraries, 19 (4), 2000, 169–174.
  17. [17] J.A. Sanchez & J.L. Leggett, Agents services for users of digitallibraries, Journal of Networks and Computer Applications, 21 (1), 1997, 45–58. doi:10.1006/jnca.1996.0038
  18. [18] C.A. Ellis, S.J. Gibbs, & G.L. Rein, Groupware: Some issuesand experiences, Comm. ACM, 34 (1), 1991, 38–58. doi:10.1145/99977.99987
  19. [19] R. Morales-Salcedo, H. Ogata, & Y. Yano, Usage of dynamic metadata for learning objects in a digital library, International Journal of Information and Systems in Education, 2(1), 2004, 42-51.

Important Links:

Go Back