A COMPARISON OF TiN, IRIDIUM AND IRIDIUM OXIDE STIMULATING ELECTRODES FOR NEURAL STIMULATION

Naser Pour Aryan, Christian Brendler, Viola Rieger, Steffen Kibbel, Alex Harscher, Gerhard Heusel, Albrecht Rothermel

References

  1. [1] James D. Weiland, David J. Anderson, Member, IEEE,and Mark S. Humayun, “In Vitro Electrical Propertiesfor Iridium Oxide Versus Titanium Nitride StimulatingElectrodes”, IEEE Transactions on biomedicalengineering, Vol. 49, No. 12, December 2002.
  2. [2] Stuart F. Cogan, “Neural Stimulation and RecordingElectrodes”, EIC Laboratories, Inc., Norwood,Massachusetts 02062
  3. [3] I-S. Lee et al.., “Neural Cells on Iridium Oxide”, KeyEngineering Materials Vols. 254-256 (2004) pp 805-808
  4. [4] Stuart F. Cogan et al., “In Vitro Comparison of theCharge Injection Limits of Activated Iridium Oxide(AIROF) and Platinum-Iridium Microelectrodes”, 2005
  5. [5] Xenia Beebe and T.L. Rose, “Charge Injection Limits ofActivated Iridium Oxide Electrodes with 0.2ms Pulsesin Bicarbonate Buffered Saline,” 1988
  6. [6] Wigand Poppendieck, "Untersuchungen zum Einsatzneuer Elektrodenmaterialien und deren Evaluation alsReiz- und Ableitelektrode," Dissertation, University ofSaarland, 2009.
  7. [7] Naser Pour Aryan, Mohammad Imam Hasan Bin Asad,Christian Brendler, Steffen Kibbel, Gerhard Heusel,Albrecht Rothermel, “In vitro Study of Titanium NitrideElectrodes for Neural Stimulation”, 33rd AnnualInternational IEEE EMBS Conference, Boston, U.S.A.,August 30 – September 3 2011519

Important Links:

Go Back