IMPROVEMENT OF THE ACTIMETRY AGREEMENT AMONG SITES BY PROPER CHOICE OF SIGNAL PROCESSING STAGES

Miguel A. García-González, Giuseppe Giovinazzo, Rafael Gómez-Bule, Francesca Landi, Juan Ramos-Castro, Javier Rosell

References

  1. [1] C. C. Yang & Y. L. Hsu, A review of accelerometry-based wearable motion detectors for physical activitymonitoring, Sensors, 10, 2010, 7772–7788.
  2. [2] S. Ancoli-Israel, R. Cole, C. Alessi, M. Chambers, W.Moorcroft & C. P. Pollak, The role of actigraphy in thestudy of sleep and circadian rhythms, SLEEP, 26 (3),2003, 342–392.
  3. [3] V. T van Hees, M. Pias, S. Taherian, U. Ekelund & S.Brage, A method to compare new and traditionalaccelerometry data in physical activity monitoring, Proc.of 2010 IEEE International Symposium on a World ofWireless Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM),Montreal, Canada, 2010, 1–6
  4. [4] J. Paquet, A. Kawinska & J. Carrier, Wake detectioncapacity of actigraphy during sleep, SLEEP, 30 (10),2007, 1362–1369.
  5. [5] M. P. Rapp, F. Nelson & M. Oliver, Comparison ofcommonly used placement sites for activity monitoring,Biological Research for Nursing, 11 (3), 2010, 302–309.
  6. [6] H. A. M. Middelkoop, E. M. Van Dam, D. A. Smilde-Van Den Doel & G. Van Dijk, 45-hour continuousquintuple-site actimetry: relations between trunk and limbmovements and effects of circadian sleep-wakerhythmicity, Psychophysiology, 34, 1997, 199–203.

Important Links:

Go Back