TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY AFFECTING BALANCING ABILITY AFTER SUDDEN UNIDIRECTIONAL PERTURBATION

Ákos Pethes

References

  1. [1] R.M. Kiss, Effect of severity of knee osteoarthritis onthe variability of gait parameters. Journal ofElectromyography and Kinesiology, 21, 2011, 695-703.
  2. [2] R.M, Kiss, Effect of degree of knee osteoarthritis onbalancing capacity after sudden perturbation. Journalof Electromyography and Kinesiology, 22, 2012, 575-581.
  3. [3] R.M. Kiss, Y. Bejek, & M. Szendroi, Variability ofgait parameters in patients with total knee arthroplasty.Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy, 20,2012, 1252-1260.
  4. [4] R. Fitzpatrick, & D.I. McClosky, Proprioceptive,visual and vestibular thresholds for the perception ofsway during standing in humans. J Physiol, 478, 1994,173-186.
  5. [5] D.S. Barrett, A.G. Cobb, & G. Bentley, Jointproprioception in normal, osteoarthritic and replacedknees. J. Bone Joint Surg Br, 73B, 1991, 53-56.
  6. [6] P. Warren, T. Olanlokun, A.G. Cobb & G. Bentley,Proprioception after knee arthroplasty, Clin. Orthop,297, 1993, 182-187.
  7. [7] S.F Attfield, T.J. Wilton, D.J. Pratt, & A.Sambatakakis, Soft-tissue balance and recovery of252proprioception after total knee replacement. J. BoneJoint Surg Br, 78B, 1996,540-545.
  8. [8] C.B. Swanik, S. Lephart, & H. Rubash,Proprioception, kinaesthesia and balance after toalknee arthroplasty with cruciate-retaining and posteriorstabilised prostheses, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 86A,2004, 328-334.
  9. [9] Y. Ishii, K. Teajima, S. Terashima, J.E. Bechtold, &R.S. Laskin, Comparison of joint position sense aftertotal knee arthroplasty, J. Arthroplasty, 1997,541–545.
  10. [10] S.M. Isaac, K.L. Barker, I.N. Danial, D.J. Beard,C.A. Dodd, & D.W. Murray, . Does arthroplasty typeinfluence knee joint proprioception? A longitudinalprospective study comparing total andunicompartmntal arthroplasty, The Knee, 14, 2007,212-217.
  11. [11] G.C. Gauchard, G. Vancon, P. Mezer, D. Mainard, &P.P. Perrin, On the role o knee joint balance controland postural strategies: Effects of total kneereplacement in elderly subjects with kneeosteoarthritis, Gait & Posture, 32, 2010, 155-160.
  12. [12] R.L. Barrack, H.B. Skinnerm S.D. Cook, & R.J.Haddad, Effect of articular disease and total kneearthroplasty on knee joint position sense, J.Neurophphysiol, 50, 1983, 684-687.
  13. [13] H.B. Skinner, R.L. Barrack, S.D. Cook, & R.J.Haddad, Joint position sense in total knee arthroplasty,J. Orthop. Res, 1, 1984, 276-283.
  14. [14] S. Simmons, S. Lephart, H. Rubash, G.W. Pifer, &R.L. Barrack, Proprioception after unicondylar kneearthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty on kneejoint position sense, Clin Orthop, 331, 1996, 179-184.
  15. [15] L. Quagliarella, N. Sasanelli, V. Moaco, G.Belgiovine, A Spinarelli, A. Noarnicola, L. Moretti, &B. Moretti, Relevance of orthostatic posturography forclinical evaluation of hip and knee joint arthroplastypatients, Gait & Posture, 34, 2011, 49–54.
  16. [16] J.H. Kellgren, & J.S. Lawrence, Radiologicalassessment of osteoarthrosis, Ann Rheum Dis, 16,1957, 494-502.
  17. [17] R.M. Kiss, A new parameter for characterizingbalancing ability on an unstable oscillatory platform,Medical Engineering and Physics, 33, 2011, 1160-1166.
  18. [18] M.C. Newitt, S.R. Cummings, S. Kidd, & D. Black,Risk factor for recurrent nonsyncopal falls: aprospective study, JAMA, 261, 1989, 2663-2668.
  19. [19] M. Freeman, Treatment of rupture of the lateralligament of the ankle, J Bone Joint Sr. Br, 47, 1965,661-668.
  20. [20] W.H. Gage, J.S. Frank, S.D. Prentice, & P.Stevenson, Postural responses following a rotationalsupport surfaces perturbation, following knee jointreplacement: Frontal plane rotations, Gait & Posture, 25,2007, 112-120.Table 1The mean ± standard deviation of Lehr’s damping ratio (D) calculated from the results of the provocation testOA osteoarthritisdominant/unaffected limb: dominant limb in healthy subjects and unaffected (healthy) limb in patientsnon-dominant/affected limb: non-dominant limb in healthy subjects and affected limb in patientsaSignificant differences in values of D compared to parameters measured while standing on both limbsbSignificant differences in values of D compared to parameters measured while standing on dominant/unaffected limbcSignificant differences in values of D of patients with OA compared to parameters of the healthy control groupdSignificant differences in values of D of patients after TKA to parameters of patients prior to TKAeSignificant differences in values of D of patients 12 weeks after TKA compared to parameters of patients 6 weeks afterTKAgSignificant differences in values of D between the gendersGenderStanding onboth limbsdominant/unaffected limbnon-dominant/affected limbMale 4.65 ± 0.33 4.47 ± 0.30 2.90 ± 0.039 a,bFemale 4.99 ± 0.29 g4.83 ± 0.28 g3.41 ± 0.031 a,b,gMalepreop 3.25 ± 0.49 c3.05 ± 0.42 c0.84 ± 0.049 a,b,c6 weeks 3.21 ± 0.34 c3.17 ± 0.39 c1.05 ± 0.039 a,b, c12 weeks 3.62 ±0.37 c,d, e3.57 ±0.35 c,d, e1.87 ±0.035 a,b,c,d, eFemalepreop 3.20 ± 0.41 c3.12 ± 0.49 c0.88 ± 0.047 a,b,c6 weeks 3.08 ± 0.37 c3.04 ± 0.37 c1.08 ±0.033 a,b,c,d12 weeks 3.67 ±0.35 c,d, e3.60 ±0.37 c,d, e1.91 ±0.033 a,b,c,d, e

Important Links:

Go Back