ANALYSIS OF DESIGN STRUCTURE MATRIX METHODS IN DESIGN PROCESS IMPROVEMENT

Indra Gunawan

References

  1. [1] S.D. Eppinger, D.E. Whitney, R.P. Smith, and D.A. Gebala, Amodel-based method for organizing tasks in product development, MIT Sloan School of Management, 1994, 1–20.
  2. [2] S.D. Eppinger and K.T. Ulrich, Product design and development, (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2003).
  3. [3] J. Maheswari and K. Varghese, A structured approach to form dependency structure matrix for construction projects, International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, 2005, 1–6.
  4. [4] M.E. Sosa, A structured approach to predicting and managing technical interactions in software development, Research in Engineering Design, 19(1), 2008, 47–70.
  5. [5] T. Mori, K. Kondo, K. Ishii, and K. Ohtomi, Task planning for product development by strategic scheduling of design reviews, ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Las Vegas, 1999, 1–12.
  6. [6] P. Sage and W.B. Rouse, Handbook of systems engineering and management (2 ed.) (New York: Wiley, 2009).
  7. [7] T.R. Browning, The many views of a process: Towards a process architecture framework for product development processes, Systems Engineering, 12(1), 2009, 69–90.
  8. [8] U. Lindemann, M. Maurer, and T. Braun, Structural complexity management – An approach for the field of product design, (Berlin: Springer, 2009).
  9. [9] A. Yassine, D. Falkenburg, and K. Chelst, Engineering design management and information structure approach, International Journal of Production Research, 37, 1999, 2957–2975.
  10. [10] A. Yassine, An introduction to modeling and analyzing complex product development processes using the design structure matrix (DSM) method, Product Development Research Laboratory, University of Illinois, 2004, 1–17.
  11. [11] D. Steward, The design structure matrix: A method for managing the design of complex systems, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 28(3), 1981, 71–74.
  12. [12] I. Gunawan and K. Ahsan, Project scheduling improvement using design structure matrix, International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, 2(4), 2010, 311–327.
  13. [13] A. Banerjee, E. Carrillo, and A. Paul, Projects with sequential iteration: Models and complexity, IIE Transactions, 39(5), 2007, 453–463.
  14. [14] T.R. Browning, Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: A review and new directions, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48(3), 2001, 292–300.
  15. [15] C. Chen, L. Khoo, and A. Jiao, Information deduction approach through quality function deployment for the quantification of the dependency between design tasks, International Journal of Production Research, 42, 2004, 4623–4637.
  16. [16] S.H. Cho and S.D. Eppinger, Product development process modeling using advanced simulation, Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Pittsburgh, 2001, 1–9.
  17. [17] M. Danilovic and T.R. Browning, Managing complex product development projects with design structure matrices and domain mapping matrices, International Journal of Project Management, 25(3), 2007, 300–314.
  18. [18] A.A. Yassine, D.E. Whitney, and T. Zambito, Assessment of rework probabilities for simulating product development using the design structure matrix (DSM), ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Pennsylvania, 2001, 1–9.
  19. [19] Design Structure Matrix Website, http://dsmweb.org.

Important Links:

Go Back