SUPPORTING VARIABLE DYAD LEARNING ACTIVITIES IN AN INSTRUCTIONAL GAME SYSTEM

C.-Y. Chou, C.-J. Lin, J.-L. Lu, and T.-W. Chan

References

  1. [1] T.W. Malone, Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction, Cognitive Science, 4, 1981, 333–369.
  2. [2] J.R. Dennis & R.J. Kansky, Computerized instructional games, in J.R. Dennis & R.J. Kansky (Eds.), Instructional computing: An acting guide for educators (Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman, 1984), 175.
  3. [3] J.M. Keller & K. Suzuki, Use of the ARCS motivational model in courseware design, in D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), Instructional designs for microcomputer courseware (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1988), 401–434.
  4. [4] M.J. Hannafin & K.L. Peck, Modes and designs of CAI, The design, development, and evaluation of instructional software (New York: Macmillan, 1988), 138–163.
  5. [5] T.W. Chan & C.Y. Chou, Exploring the design of computer supports for reciprocal tutoring, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 1997, 1–29.
  6. [6] S. Bull & E. Broady, Spontaneous peer tutoring from sharing student models, Proc. AI-ED 97 World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Kobe, Japan, 1997, 143–150.
  7. [7] J. Greer, G. McCalla, J. Collins, V. Kumar, P. Meagher, & J. Vassileva, Supporting peer help and collaboration in distributed workplace environments, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 9, 1998, 159–177.
  8. [8] F.L. Lee, S. Liang, & T.W. Chan, An attempt to design synchronous collaborative learning environments for dyad peers on the world wide web, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 21(2), 1999, 221–253.
  9. [9] T.W. Chan & A.B. Baskin, Learning companion systems, in C. Frasson & G. Gauthier (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems: At the crossroads of artificial intelligence and education (New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation, 1990), Chapter 1, 6–33.
  10. [10] F. Nichols, Issues in designing learning by teaching systems, Proc. the East-West International Conference on Computer Technologies in Education (EW-ED’94), 1994, 176–181.
  11. [11] J.A. Ramirez Uresti, Should I teach my computer peer? Some issues in teaching a learning companion, in G. Gauthier, C. Frasson, & K. Vanlehn (Eds.), ITS’2000, Lecture notes of computer science, 1839 (London, UK: Springer-Verlag, 2000), 103–112.
  12. [12] C.J. Lin, C.Y. Chou, & T.W. Chan, Computers as aids for accessing cognition of students, in J.D. Moore, C.L. Redfield, & W.L. Johnson (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education — AI-ED in the wired and wireless future (Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2001), 571–573.
  13. [13] A. Newell & H.A. Simon, Human problem solving (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1972).
  14. [14] L. Vygotsky, Mind in society (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978).
  15. [15] T.W. Chan, Y.L. Chung, R.G. Ho, W.J. Hou, & G.L. Lin, Distributed learning companion systems — WEST revisited, in C. Frasson, G. Gauthier & G. McCalla (Eds.), The 2nd international conference of intelligent tutoring systems, Lecture notes in computer science, 608 (Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1992), 643–650.
  16. [16] C.Y. Chou, T.W. Chan, & C.J. Lin, An approach of implementing general learning companions for problem solving, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 14(6), 2002, 1376–1386.

Important Links:

Go Back