ENHANCING CREATIVITY WITH COLLABORATIVE LEARNING AND PURPOSE-BUILT ENVIRONMENTS

S. Nichol and K. Blashki

References

  1. [1] M.S. Blumenthal, A.S. Inouye, & W.J. Mitchell, Beyond productivity: Information, technology, innovation, and creativity (Washington, DC: The National Academics Press, 2003).
  2. [2] M. Csikszentmihalyi, Creativity: Flow and the psychology ofdiscovery and invention (New York: Harper Collins Publishers,1996).
  3. [3] D.A. Schön, Educating the reflective practitioner (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1987).
  4. [4] K. Blashki, Learning = working: Professional engagement inacademic curricula. Australian Conference Information Systems, 2001, 23–29.
  5. [5] J. Dewey, How we think (New York: Heath, 1933).
  6. [6] H. Gardner, Creating minds (New York: BasicBooks, 1993).
  7. [7] R.E. Ripple, Ordinary creativity, Contemporary EducationalPsychology, 14, 1989, 189–202. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(89)90009-X
  8. [8] D.K. Smith, D.B. Paradice & S.M. Smith, Prepare your mindfor creativity, Communications of the ACM, 43 (7), 2000,111–116. doi:10.1145/341852.341870
  9. [9] J. Piirto, Understanding creativity (Scottsdale: Great Potential Press, 2004).
  10. [10] M.A. Runco & M.D. Bahleda, Implicit theories of artistic, scientific, and everyday creativity, Journal of Creative Behaviour, 23, 1989, 93–98.
  11. [11] G. Ekvall, Creative climate, in S. Pritzker & M.A. Runco(Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (San Diego, CA: AcademicPress, 1999), 403–413).
  12. [12] C.W. Prather & L.K. Gundry, Blueprints for innovation:How creative processes can make you and your companymore competitive (Annapolis, MD: Bottom Line InnovationAssociates Inc, 2003).
  13. [13] K.J. Lauer, The assessment of creative climate: An investigation of Ekvall’s creative climate questionnaire (Buffalo, NY: State University College).
  14. [14] K. Blashki & S. Nichol, Games geek goss: Linguistic creativity in young males, Australian Journal of Emerging Technology and Society, 3 (1), 2005, 71–80.
  15. [15] S.G. Isaksen et al., Perceptions of the best and worst climates for creativity: Preliminary validation evidence for the situational outlook questionnaire, Creativity Research Journal, 13 (2), 2001, 171–184. doi:10.1207/S15326934CRJ1302_5
  16. [16] K. Blashki, (W)reading, wrangling and the rhythm of thetext: Enhancing the education of young boys with game-based learning, Papers: Explorations into Children’s Literature,14 (2), 2004, 38–43.
  17. [17] W. Carr & S. Kemmis, Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research (Geelong: Deakin University Press,1986).
  18. [18] P. Checkland, Systems thinking, systems practice (Chinchester: John Wiley and Sons, 1999).
  19. [19] W. Pasmore, Action research in the workplace: The sociotechnical perspective, in P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.),Handbook of action research (London: SAGE Publications,2001), 38–47.
  20. [20] M. Levin & D. Greenwood, Pragmatic action research and thestruggle to transform universities into learning communities, inP. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research(London: SAGE Publications, 2001), 104–113.
  21. [21] K.A. Bruffee, Collaborative learning (London: The JohnsHopkins University Press, 1999).
  22. [22] B. Shneiderman, Creating creativity: User interfaces for supporting innovation, ACM Trans on Computer–Human Interaction (TOCHI), 7(1), 2000, 114–138. doi:10.1145/344949.345077
  23. [23] L. Candy & E. Edmonds, Explorations in art and technology(London: Springer-Verlag, 2002).
  24. [24] S. Nichol & K. Blashki, The realm of the game geek: Supporting creativity in an online community, Int. Conf. on Web Based Communities (IADIS), Spain, 2006, 247–252.
  25. [25] K. Blashki, Learning for life: Lessons from the education of multimedia practitioners, Journal of Widening Participationand Lifelong Learning, 4 (3), 2002, 35–45.

Important Links:

Go Back