A NOVEL APPROACH TO DISCRIMINATE BETWEEN INRUSH AND INTERTURN FAULT CURRENTS OF TRANSFORMER

Ganesh Bonde, Sudhir Paraskar, Saurabh Jadhao, and Dwarakadas Kothari

References

  1. [1] S.R. Paraskar, M.A. Beg, and G.M. Dhole, Discrimination between inrush and fault in transformer: ANN approach, International Journal of Advancements in Technology, 2(2), 2011, 306–318.
  2. [2] Z. Moravej, D.N. Vishvakarma, and S.P. Singh, Digital filtering algorithms for the differential relaying of power transformer: An over view, Electric Machines and Power Systems, 28, 2000, 485–500.
  3. [3] A. Omar and S. Youssef, A wavelet-based technique for discrimination between faults and magnetizing inrush currents in transformers, IEEE Transaction on Power Delivery, 18(1), 2003, 170–176.
  4. [4] M.E. Hamedani Golshan, M. Saghaian-Nejad, M. Saha, and A.H. Samet, A new method for recognizing internal faults from inrush current conditions in digital differential protection of power transformers, Electric Power System Research, 71, 2004, 61–71.
  5. [5] M.M. Eissa, A novel digital directional transformer protection technique based on wavelet packet, IEEE Transaction on Power Delivery, 20(3), 2005, 1830–1836.
  6. [6] J. Faiz and S. Lotfifard. A novel wavelet based algorithm for discrimination of internal faults from magnetizing inrush current in power transforms, IEEE Transaction on Power Delivery, 21(4), 2006, 1989–1996.
  7. [7] H. Monsef and S. Lotfifard, Internal fault current identification based on wavelet transform in power transformers, Electric Power System Research, 77, 2007, 1637–1645.
  8. [8] A. Sahebi and H. Samet, Efficient method for discrimination between inrush current and internal faults in power transformers based on the non-saturation zone, IET Generation Transmission & Distribution, 11(6), 2017, 1486–1493.
  9. [9] M.B. Raichura, N.G. Chothani, and D.D. Patel, Identification of internal fault against external abnormalities in power transformer using hierarchical ensemble extreme learning machine technique, IET Science, Measurement & Technology, 14(1), 2020, 111–121.
  10. [10] G.-X. Wu, J.-Z. Zhang, Z.-Y. Lai, S.-L. He, and X.-S. Wen, A method to identify inrush current based on deep convolutional neural networks, International Conf. on Advanced Electrical, Mechatronics and Computer Engineering (AEMCE 2019), 2019, Shenzhen, China, ISBN: 978-1-60595-618-3.
  11. [11] S. Jazebi, B. Vahidi, and M. Jannati, A novel application of wavelet based SVM to transient phenomena identification of power transformers, Energy Conversion and Management, 52, 2011, 1354–1363.
  12. [12] P. Maya, S. Vidya Shreeb, K. Roopasree, and K.P. Soman, Discrimination of internal fault current and inrush current in a power transformer using empirical wavelet transform, Procedia Technology, 21, 2015, 514–519.
  13. [13] A.M. Shah and B.R. Bhalja, Discrimination between internal faults and other disturbances in transformer using the support vector machine-based protection scheme, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 28(3), 2013, 1508–1515.
  14. [14] G.-B. Huang, Q.-Y. Zhu, and C.-K. Siew, Extreme learning machine: Theory and applications, Neurocomputing, 70(1), 2006, 489–501.
  15. [15] J. Chorowski, J. Wang, and J.M. Zurada, Review and performance comparison of SVMand ELM-based classifiers, Neurocomputing, 128(Supplement C), 2014, 507–516.
  16. [16] M. Bucurica, R. Dogaru, and I. Dogaru, A comparison of extreme learning machine and support vector machine classifiers, 2015 IEEE Int. Conf. on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing (ICCP), Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 2015, 471–474.
  17. [17] X.-F. Wang, Transformer inrush current identification based on EMD+TEO methods, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 556–562, 2014, 3129–3133.
  18. [18] V.S. Mahalle, G.N. Bonde, S.S. Jadhao, and S.R. Paraskar, Teager energy operator: A signal processing approach for detection and classification of power quality events, Proc. of the 2nd International Con. on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI 2018) IEEE Conference Record: # 42666, Tirunelveli, 2018, 1109–1114.
  19. [19] H. Xiao, J. Wei, H. Liu, Q. Li, Y. Shi, and T. Zhang, Identification method for power system low-frequency oscillations based on improved VMD and Teager–Kaiser energy operator, IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 11(16), 2017, 4096–4103.
  20. [20] F. Salzenstein, P. Montgomery, and A.O. Boudraa, Local frequency and envelope estimation by Teager–Kaiser energy operators in white-light scanning interferometry, Optics Express, 22(15), 2014, 18325–34.
  21. [21] S.-H. Cho, J.-U. Kim, I.-Y. Chung, and J.-H. Han, Determination of power-quality disturbances using Teager energy operator and Kalman filter algorithms, International Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems, 12(1), 2012, 42–46.
  22. [22] A. Subasi, A.S. Yilmaz, and K. Tufan, Detection of generated and measured transient power quality events using Teager Energy Operator, Energy Conversion and Management, 52, 2011, 1959–1967.
  23. [23] D. Patel, N.G. Chothani, K.D. Mistry, and M. Raichura, Design and development of fault classification algorithm based on relevance vector machine for power transformer, IET Electric Power Applications, 12(4), 2018, 557–565.
  24. [24] S. Hajiaghasi, K. Abbaszadeh, and A. Salemnia, A new approach for transformer interturn faults detection using vibration frequency analysis, Iranian Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 15(1), 2019, 14–28.
  25. [25] H. Mohammadpour, R. Dashti, and H.R. Shaker, A new practical approach for discrimination between inrush currents and internal faults in power transformers, Technology and Economics of Smart Grids and Sustainable Energy, 5 (1), 2020, 1–10.

Important Links:

Go Back