SUPPORTING PROJECT MANAGEMENT WITH FINE-GRAINED ARTEFACT MANAGEMENT IN ADAMS

F. Fasano∗ and R. Oliveto∗∗

References

  1. [1] M. Light, B. Rosser, & S. Hayward, Realizing the Bene-fits of Project and Portfolio Management, Gartner Research,Document Number G00125673, 2005, 1–31.
  2. [2] P. Jackson & J. Klobas, Building knowledge in projects: Apractical application of social constructivism to informationsystems development, International Journal of Project Man-agement, 26(4), 2008, 329–337
  3. [3] L. Raymond & F. Bergeron, Project management informationsystems: An empirical study of their impact on project man-agers and project success, International Journal of ProjectManagement, 26(2), 2008, 213–220.
  4. [4] L. Aversano, A. De Lucia, M. Gaeta, P. Ritrovato, S. Stefanucci,& M.L. Villani, Managing coordination and cooperation indistributed software processes: the GENESIS environment,Software Process: Improvement and Practice, 9(4), 2004, 239–263.
  5. [5] G. Cugola, Tolerating deviations in process support systemsvia flexible enactment of process models, IEEE Transactionson Software Engineering, 24(11), 1998, 982–1001.
  6. [6] F. Maurer, B. Dellen, F. Bendeck, S. Goldmann, H. Holz,B. K¨otting, & M. Schaaf, Merging project planning and web-enabled dynamic workflow for software development, IEEEInternet Computing, 4(3), 2000, 65–74.
  7. [7] G. Alonso & C. Mohan, Workflow management systems: Thenext generation of distributed procesing tools, Jajodia & L.Kerschberg (Eds.), Advanced transaction models and archi-tectures (Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic, 1997), chapter 1,35–62.
  8. [8] P. Grefen, B. Pernici, & G. S´anchez (Eds.), Database supportfor workflow management: The WIDE project (Norwell, MA:Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999).
  9. [9] D. Georgakopoulos, H. Hornick, & A. Sheth, An overview ofworkflow management: from process modelling to workflowautomation infrastructure, Distributed and Parallel Databases3(2), 1995, 119–153.
  10. [10] Workflow Management Coalition, Workflow ManagementCoalition Interface 1: Process Definition Interchange ProcessModel, Document no. WFMC-TC-1016-P, 1999, available fromhttp://www.aiim.org/wfmc/standards/docs/if19910v11.pdf.
  11. [11] V. Ambriola, R. Conradi, & A. Fuggetta, Assessing Process-Centered Software Engineering Environments, ACM Transac-tion on Software Engineering and Methodology, 6(3), 1998,283–328.
  12. [12] S. Bandinelli, E.D. Nitto, & A. Fuggetta, Supporting coop-eration in the SPADE-1 environment, IEEE Transactions onSoftware Engineering, 22(12), 1996, 841–865.
  13. [13] S. Bandinelli, A. Fuggetta, C. Ghezzi, & L. Lavazza, SPADE:An environment for software process analysis, design, andenactment, in Software process modelling and technology (A.Finkelstein, J. Kramer, & B. Nuseibeh, (Eds.)) (ResearchStudies Press Limited, John Wiley & Sons, 1994).
  14. [14] J.C. Grundy, M.D. Apperley, J.G. Hosking, & W.B. Mugridge,A decentralized architecture for software process modeling andenactment, IEEE Internet Computing, 2(5), 1998, 53–62.
  15. [15] G. Cugola, E.D. Nitto, & A. Fuggetta, The JEDI event-basedinfrastructure and its application to the development of theOPSS WFMS, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering,27(9), 2001, 827–850.
  16. [16] J. Cleland-Huang, C.K. Chang, & M. Christensen, Event-based traceability for managing evolutionary change, IEEETransaction on Software Engineering, 29(9), 2003, 796–810.
  17. [17] F. Fasano, Fine-grained management of software artefacts,Ph.D. Thesis, University of Salerno, available online from:http://sesa.dmi.unisa.it/thesis/fasano.pdf
  18. [18] O. Gotel & A. Finkelstein, An analysis of the requirementstraceability problem, in Proc. 1st International Conferenceon Requirements Engineering, Colorado Springs, CO, 1994,94–101.
  19. [19] S. Deerwester, S.T. Dumais, G.W. Furnas, T.K. Lan-dauer, &R. Harshman, Indexing by latent semantic analysis, Journalof the American Society for Information Science, 41(1), 1990,391–407.
  20. [20] A. De Lucia, F. Fasano, R. Oliveto, & G. Tortora, Recoveringtraceability links in software artefact management systemsusing information retrieval methods, ACM Transactions onSoftware Engineering and Methodology, 16(4), Article no. 13,2007.
  21. [21] A. De Lucia, F. Fasano, G. Scanniello, & G. Tortora, Enhancingcollaborative synchronous uml modelling with fine-grainedversioning of software artefacts, Journal of Visual Languages& Computing, 18(5), 2007, 492–503.
  22. [22] A. De Lucia, F. Fasano, G. Scanniello, & G. Tortora, Assessingthe effectiveness of a distributed method for code inspection:A controlled experiment, Proc. 2nd International Conferenceon Global Software Engineering, Munich, Germany, 2007, 252–261.

Important Links:

Go Back