Sensor and Actuator Modelling Issues in Achieving the Tracking Control of a Pendulum

R. Madhavan


  1. [1] J. Sandor & D. Williamson, Identification and analysis ofnonlinear systems by tensor techniques, International Journalof Control, 27 (6), 1978, 853–878. doi:10.1080/00207177808922417
  2. [2] R. Madhavan, Numerically efficient trajectory tracking controlof polynomic nonlinear systems, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. onRobotics and Automation, Detroit, USA, May 1999, 2952–2957. doi:10.1109/ROBOT.1999.774045
  3. [3] R. Madhavan, Tracking control of a pendulum using a computationally efficient state estimation approach for polynomic nonlinear systems, International Journal of Control, 72 (17), 1999, 1565–1591. doi:10.1080/002071799220056
  4. [4] L. Ljung, System identification theory for the user (New York:PTR Prentice Hall, 1987).
  5. [5] D. Williamson, Digital control and implementation finitewordlength considerations (New York: Prentice Hall, 1991).
  6. [6] R.C. Dorf, The electrical engineering handbook (Boca Raton,FL: CRC Press, 1993).
  7. [7] Hewlett Packard, Two channel optical incremental encodermodule—HEDS-9100 Series, 1995.
  8. [8] G. Weiss, Usage of a vibrating gyroscope for orientation estimation, Technical report, University of Kaiserslautern, Germany,1993.
  9. [9] A. Papoulis, Probability, random variables, and stochasticprocesses (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991).
  10. [10] G+G Technics AG, Signal conditioner SA40012, Schweiz,Germany, 1994.
  11. [11] Spectron Systems Technology Inc., Electrolytic level sensors, 1993.
  12. [12] G. Tao & P.V. Kokotovi´c, Adaptive control of systems withactuator and sensor nonlinearities (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1996).
  13. [13] Precision DC Motors, Precision DC motors, gear boxes and servo mounting kit, November 1992.

Important Links:

Go Back